Samstag, 6. März 2010

Flame and Citron (New DVD Review)

Flame and Citron (Ole Christian Madsen, 2009) - Flame and Citron is a story of Nazi-killing resistance fighters in Denmark and is based on actual events (unlike Quentin Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds, despite advertisements to the contrary). World War II is on, and the Nazis have occupied Denmark. Flame and Citron are partners in a resistance organization who assassinate Danish collaborators, whom they consider to be the same as Nazis. They describe their enemies in ugly, dehumanizing terms - Denmark was "crawling" with Nazi "vermin" - that echoes the type of racist language one hears in films about Nazi treatment of Jews, or in any story of a majority oppressing an ethnic minority. This parallel complicates how we identify with the supposed heroes, a complexity that only deepens as the story unfolds. The jolt of the first two assassinations we witness is thrilling, setting up a plot that would explore the moral quandaries around fighting Nazis through the murder of civilians (the primary targets seem to be newspaper editors printing Nazi propaganda and civilian informants). It's a promising start that ultimately gets bungled through poor direction.

The resistance movement is organized in a hierarchical structure with many moving parts that the film never really articulates with clarity, despite multiple laborious efforts to do so. There is a reference to the "Special Forces" and multiple train rides to and from Sweden for posh organizational meetings (these supposedly "famous" assassins are free to travel abroad?). Apparently the group is receiving orders from the British. Exactly why a native Danish resistance movement should receive unquestioned direct orders from the British is a question left unanswered, which is a major flaw, as much of the plot turns on this fact. If these are heroes are routinely risking their lives by killing Nazi collaborators and becoming local legends as a result, why on earth would they be tied down by shady businessmen?

Eventually, it becomes revealed that some of their targets may have been selected for less-than-pure reasons. By the time Citron declares, "We will go after our own targets," I had been wondering for quite some time why they hadn't already been doing so. If life under the Nazis was so oppressive and horrible, wouldn't it be obvious to all those in the resistance who the targets for assassination should be? Wouldn't their desperation cause them to ignore protocol (from Great Britain, no less) and simply attack those that deserve it? They are referred to as idealistic dreamers frequently in the film, but I don't buy it. That kind of characterization, on which the film insists, just doesn't jive with the story.

While it insists on their unlikely purity, the film, to its credit, doesn't allow them to escape with their hands clean. It makes our protagonists the pawns of a complex entanglement of wartime money-grabs. It is certainly an unromantic expression of the Danish resistance overall. While the subject matter is intriguing, the sensibility adult, and the morality nicely complicated, the film fails to be convincing, as it suffers from very poor direction. I've never seen a film in which I so often felt the camera was in the wrong place. Director Madsen's sense of spatial congruency is far removed from reality, which makes several elements of the plot hard to understand. He also fails to build suspense in scenes that could probably be cranked to 11 on the suspense meter. The climactic battle is the worst example of these problems. It simply doesn't make any sense spatially, and fails to draw the viewer in with suspense.

Most egregiously, it makes absolutely no sense why these two "heroes" of the resistance are allowed to operate so openly, and can continue to walk among Nazi Germans without notice, even after leaving eyewitnesses alive and well at their crime scenes. Its as if the Nazis and resistance had an understanding, that as long as the resistance were allowed to satisfy their bloodlust, the Nazis would look the other way. That street went both ways, as the resistance for some reason is unwilling to assassinate actual German Nazis. This is all very fruitful material, but the film instead bogs us down with a lot of undramatic exposition, and never really follows through on these ideas. The result is a bit of a logical mess.

Maxwell Anderson is an avid film watcher and blogger. He is also a freelance assistant video editor in New York City. You can contact him through his blog Ecstatic Text: http://ecstatictext.blogspot.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Maxwell_Anderson

A Heroes Season Five? Absolutely!

HEROES TODAY

Now that Heroes Season 4 has officially come to an end, but Heroes owner NBC has not yet confirmed a fifth Heroes season, fans all over the world are becoming truly worried. The internet, as the ultimate meeting point of gossip, displays lots of rumors about Heroes coming back or not and a lot of webblogs are making lists about reasons pro and against. You can even sign an online Heroes petition to support a fifth Heroes season.

The series follows the lives of ordinary people across the globe who discover various superhuman abilities as they struggle to cope with their everyday lives and prevent foreseen disasters from occurring. Heroes is popular and carries a strong following, although the official ratings are weak. Additionally, Heroes was the MOST downloaded and streamed television show last year. So many people are watching it, but most are not tuning in the moment it airs.

Unfortunately, at the end of the day, it's up to NBC to decide if the show is worth bringing back, financially speaking. Networks are in the money making business, and if the show can still make them enough, they'll bring it back regardless of criticisms leveled at the show by fans and critics. The expensive NBC series has always performed well overseas, but the network needs "Heroes" to pull decent numbers in its own backyard too. During season 4, Heroes continued its decline and has dropped to a level that would normally lead to cancellation. The deciding factor here is NBC's internal balance sheet for the production. Yes, it's all about the money...

A FIFTH SEASON?

The main question is not only if there's enough profit to be made but also if Heroes' writers can recover the award winning quality of the first season and thereby restore NBC's trust. The answer to these questions lead us to three possible outcomes, from which only two seem realistic to me. The first one is, obviously (and hopefully) a resumption of Heroes, either in it's current or (more likely) a renewed form. The second option is the release of one or more 'rap-it-all-up episodes' (don't be surprised if NBC announces a 12-hour "final chapter" for next fall). The third (to me most improbable) option is the series coming to a definite end, leaving all the fans on a limb wondering what happened after Claire did the unthinkable. At this point, it seems unlikely that NBC will leave us with so many loose ends to tie up.

CONCLUSION

We'll find out when they figure it out, I guess. But I do have a strong gut feeling we can enjoy new Heroes episodes soon. And then there is hope! Greg Grunberg, who plays Matt Parkman on the show, said "I'm hearing rumors, I'm hearing good rumors". "We clearly did not wrap up the overall lure and story of Heroes (Source: TV Guide Magazine). Grunberg also said on his Twitter that he "Can't imagine not coming back" when a fan asked him if Heroes will come back for season 5. If the NBC is really considering to pull out the plug, we should all pray for the help of some true Heroes out there working hard to prevent this disaster from becoming a reality.

Vincent Allard is an Internet Marketer, teacher and dedicated father. Who's passions including helping people, good asian food, practice Tai Chi, NBC's 'Heroes' and watching good movies.

streaming

fifth heroes season

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Vincent_Allard

Lost Season 1 - TV Show Review

Lost. When it first came on the air on ABC it was an instant hit with over 100 million viewers over the first few episodes. After spending some time watching the DVD's for the first time, I can certainly understand why.

Lost begins with a plane crash on a jet traveling from Australia to Los Angeles. The first glimpses of the science fiction orientation of the show occur when we see that close to 50 passengers not only survive the crash, but many of them have barely a bruise on themselves. The cast which, at the time, had at least 14 main characters quickly realizes they have crashed on (what they think) is a deserted island somewhere in the South Pacific. Through conversations with the other cast-aways they realize that one stewardess has survived and she informs them that they had diverted back to Australia due to mechanical difficulties so they were at least 2 hours off course and they have virtually no hope of rescue.

During the first season of the show the writers give us plenty of topics which will continue throughout the entire series. To start we see common science fiction elements (a man in a wheel chair can not only walk, but catch wild boar) as well as human interest elements as each individual has a series of choices to make in order to become a better person or not, such as whether or not to continue using illegal drugs.

By the end of the first season they realize that not only are they not alone on the island, but perhaps the others on the island are not going to be helping them to escape back to civilization.

It is with this backdrop of survival and the fight to leave the island and be rescued that we're able to peer into our society from a distance and confront some of the common questions we all must answer during our lives. How honest should we be? Are we fundamentally good people? What would you do for your children? How do you value the lives of your family versus a stranger? 10 strangers?

In many ways I believe Lost became such a commercial success because it posed these complicated questions and interesting human interactions. I thoroughly enjoyed the first season, it was unpredictable while offering a unique viewing experience by offering a continual flashback into characters' lives with one character being featured in each episode.

Want more wine information? Want to join a real wine club that is interested in more then just taking your money for their real business? Use promo code EZine at Uncorked Ventures to take 10% off your first wine club order just for reading this article!

Wine Clubs

Wine Club

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Mark_A_Aselstine

"Alice in Wonderland" Movie Review

"Alice in Wonderland"
My 0-10 rating: 6
Genre: Adventure, Fantasy
Director: Tim Burton
Screenwriter: Linda Woolverton, based on the

1865 Lewis Carroll classic
Starring: Johnny Depp, Anne Hathaway, Helena Bonham Carter, Crispin Glover, Stephen Fry, Matt Lucas, Alan Rickman, Michael Sheen
Time: 1 hr., 48 min.
Rating: PG (for fantasy action/violence involving scary images and situations, and for a smoking caterpillar)

Totally formula, completely politically corrected, but it'll dazzle you with the supercharged power of special effects.

In terms of pure entertainment value, by the sheer brute force of computer effects, "Alice in Wonderland" will not leave you indifferent, especially not in 3-D. And for sure, Johnny Depp's wonderfully imaginative interpretations are good for a major draw.

But in story hooks, this is very orthodox stuff. That is, orthodox for the last 20 years in which filmmakers pay slavish tribute to the demands of female empowerment at the expense of old-timey whimsy and waggery. In particular, it seems that a fairy tale can't be told anymore in the spirit in which it was written. Hey, I'm all for female equality everywhere but when it changes the whole sense of a classic story -- no. Can you imagine, say, polically correcting a Jane Austen story? No? Then why a fable? Besides that, this film follows along the usual route to a grand, special effects-driven finale designed for marketing videogames soon to come.

Here then we are treated, or bludgeoned, with one obligatory scene after the next of Alice confronting and mowing down one Victorian value after the next, leaving the magic of the Lewis Carroll classic in the dust. Alice, unlike in the original tale, is in complete charge of everybody and everything. And with special effects.

Granted, the film does preserve to some degree various charming critters and glib dialogue. And visual surprises are many. Your head is zipped around adroitly by the well-established Tim Burton genius. The scene designs are as extravagant as they are vibrant. You can legitimately love 'em. And Alice's experiences are indeed wondrous to behold.

The 1865 Lewis Carroll classic has now been adapted to grown-up Alice Kingsleigh (Mia Wasikowska) as now a 19-year-old bride-to-be. So this is her second trip to the strange world beneath the earth's surface. It's motivated by her being driven to distraction at a totally boring engagement party, not to say a futile proposal by a lad from the aristocracy, moving her to dive into the same magical rabbit hole of her years of yore.

She'll meet again with the English white rabbitt (Michael Sheen) as she finds all of her old pals and a few new: the Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp) who's trying to hide from his past and who's afflicted with mercury poisoning and a troubled past. Then come the zany twins Tweedledum and Tweedledee (Matt Lucas), the infamously frustrating Cheshire Cat (Stephen Fry) who's blessed with a spinning head, then the frightening Jabberwocky ( Christopher Lee), then Bayard the Bloodhound (Timothy Spall), the Dormouse (Barbara Windsor), the March Hare (Paul Whitehouse), the villainous Knave of Hearts (Crispin Glover), Absolem the Caterpillar (Alan Rickman), the sweet but anxious White Queen (Anne Hathaway) and the oh-so-evil Red Queen (Helena Bonham Carter) who's still doing "off with their heads!" and who abounds with zany situations and funny things to say.

And here's Alice among them again, now of solid character and self-confidence, undaunted and forthright. The Red Queen, obviously will be her arch-enemy. The story will have Alice, of course, face a raging monster.

If you overlook all the modern conventions in this genre, here used endlessly, and just sit back and enjoy the vigorous crazy humor, this is a modestly fun movie.

Marty Meltz, http://www.martymoviereviews.com, was the 30-year films critic for the Award-winning Maine Sunday Telegram until his column was budget-cut on Dec. 31, 2007.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Marty_Meltz

"Brooklyn's Finest" Movie Review

"Brooklyn's Finest"
My 0-10 rating: 7
Genre: Crime, Drama
Director: Antoine Fuqua
Screenwriter: Michael C. Martin, Brad Caleb Kane
Starring: Richard Gere, Ethan Hawke, Don Cheadle, Jesse Williams, Ellen Barkin, Wesley Snipes, Lili Taylor, Will Patton, Vincent D'Onofrio
Time: 2 hrs., 13 min.
Rating: R (for bloody violence throughout, strong sexuality including graphic sex, nudity, drug content and pervasive vulgarity)

Gushing with bloody shootings, with enough of it to satiate even the most bloodthirsty violence aficionado for the next year, "Brooklyn's Finest" is immersed, almost drowned, in its gripping delivery.

This is by director Antoine Fuqua who did the similarly mega-powered photographic juggernaut, the 2001 "Training Day," a film which set a fairly unreachable standard of shadowy visual embellishment of everything falling within the reach of the camera.

Again, drugs are the basic generators of all the evil, and desperate humans are the drivers of a plot that amounts to little more than a wearisome cliche in itself but is buried under character close-ups of such scorching intensity that your attention is riveted mercilessly. Fuqua's method to his madness comes at you like a tsunami of human hostility, leaving your senses immobilized possibly for hours afterwards.

From the beginning, it's obvious that the crime and corruption-ridden East Brooklyn streets are cellars of sudden death where no man can make the same mistake once -- and a man's shadow might not be his own. Burning suspicions, catastrophically greedy motives, instant revenge and the erasing of individuals with chilling efficiency make the expression "lifestyle" irrelevant and deathstyle the only point.

Performances are uniformly outstanding with a virility of rare compulsion with each male and female player going at it as though this will be the ultimate judgment of his or her career.

Plot values are rather inconsequential. The sheer power of the portrayals of the violence are the focus of darkest artistry.

As the story makes clear immediately, things do seem rather like hell itself on East Brooklyn. Our key characters -- three cops -- are Eddie (Richard Gere) who is stumbling through his last seven days on the job, Tango (Don Cheadle) who's an undercover cop whose wife has left him over related issues, he now facing issues with his chief (Will Patton) and a hard-driving, snarling and snapping federal agent Smith (Ellen Barkin) who want him to set up his buddy Caz (Wesley Snipes) who's a drug dealer with Tango to be rewarded with a desk job, and narcotics cop Sal Procida (Ethan Hawke), an undeserving father who's forever complaining that his house is too small for his family even as he loafs around in a huge basement entertainment room playing poker with his friends.

Those are your basics, all played as stereotypes you've seen in films back into time. Filling out personalities are interludes between Eddie and his hooker girlfriend (Shannon Kane). Tango's inner conflicts over the prospect of betraying his best buddy, and the fact of Sal's having five kids and a wife (Lili Taylor) who's pregnant with twins, he being given to attending the confession booth.

They're all headed for ugly stuff involving unmitigated police corruption and downbeat with inner and exterior conflicts for each bleakly scripted cop. Yet with all the film's power, its center on raw violence has an even tone which does not work to its advantage. In irony, the violence actually becomes monotonous at times.

Steel yourself for this. Then come and see what you think.

Marty Meltz, http://www.martymoviereviews.com, was the 30-year films critic for the Award-winning Maine Sunday Telegram until his column was budget-cut on Dec. 31, 2007.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Marty_Meltz